Monday, March 7, 2011

Consciousness

Biology is defined as "the study of life." There has already been a vast amount of work put into this subject, but modern scientists still do not know what “life” is.
As explained in Dr. T.D. Singh’s book “Life and Spiritual Evolution,” we cannot properly understand the concept of life without understanding consciousness. Consciousness is the main symptom of life. With it, we get free will, personality, and identity. As Neils Bohr said, “we can admittedly fin nothing in physics or chemistry that has even a remote bearing on consciousness. Yet all of us know that there is such a thing as consciousness, simply because we have it ourselves. Hence consciousness must be part of nature, or more generally, of reality, which means that, quite apart from the laws of physics or chemistry, as laid down in quantum theory, must also consider laws of quite a different nature.”
Even one of the sharpest minds of the 20th century, Albert Einstein, seemed to believe that to fully understand the mysteries of the universe we need to broaden our perspective.
"Try and penetrate with our limited means the secrets of nature and you will find that, behind all the discerning concatenations, there remains something subtle, intangible and inexplicable. Veneration for this force beyond anything that we can comprehend is my religion."
~Albert Einstein
So you see that the idea of a subtle dimension of reality is very much present not only in fields of the human mind but even in relation to non-living matter. You also see that this concept is not a mental speculation of religious personel but of even some of the brightest scientists of this age.
In closing, we see that, even if not true, the idea of a subtle dimension needs definate research, so that we can decide once and for all which paridigm of creation, or at least reality, is true.

Saturday, February 26, 2011

The Six Types of Evolution

There are six types of evolution:
  1. Cosmic evolution - the origin of time, space and matter. (The Big Bang Theory)
  2. Chemical evolution - the origin of other elements from hydrogen
  3. Stellar and Planetary evolution - the evolution of stars and planets
  4. Organic evolution - origin of life
  5. Macro-evolution - changing from one animal into another
  6. Micro evolution - changes within species. out of all six, only this one has been observed
In 1965 it was taught that the "Big Bang" was caused by the explosion of a spinning, hot body of mass 275 million miles in diameter. In 1974 they revised their figure to say that the mass that exploded was only 54 thousand miles across. Then, in 1983, the figure was reduced to one trillionth the diameter of a proton. What caused this now very small mass to explode, they can't say. Science is meant to be based on observation. In my personal observations, explosions usually tend to destroy things, not create them, e.g. Hiroshima and Nagasaki. However, the textbooks say that the universe was created in a "Big Bang." There are two prominent reasons why the "Big Bang" is an unintelligent theory. One, there is a law of physics called the conservation of angular momentum. That means that if a spinning mass breaks apart, all the pieces will spin in the same direction. Interestingly enough, two planets (Venus and Uranus) and six moons spin backwards from the other planets. Two, if there had been a "Big Bang," the matter would be evenly distributed. It wouldn't be distributed in odd galaxies and planetary systems with a vast number of light years in between.
Stellar and Planetary evolution, or the creation of a new star or planet, has never been observed. Macro-evolution is also completely theoretical. It has never been proved, or seen, and there is no scientific evidence that it could happen, either. Micro evolution does happen, your child may have a different eye color or height than you. In fact, when breeding dogs, we see this all the time: breeders will choose two dogs with specific qualities, breed them, and get a litter that's taller or shorter, meaner or nicer, etc. than the other dogs. But we have never to this day seen a dog produce an animal of a completely different kind. A dog has never given birth to a chicken, and a chicken has never given birth to a crocodile.
In my last article, I talked about Organic evolution, or the origin of life, so I feel no need to mention it here.

Friday, February 25, 2011

Exposing the Lie of Darwinism

Darwin's theory of a slow evolution from a single cell of life to all the biodiversity present today is just as preposterous now as it was when he was first scorned by the scientists of his time. Actually, in light of recent discoveries, Darwin's theory is even more deplorable today than it was in its prime. Because protein is needed for DNA synthesis and DNA is needed for protein synthesis, we have a chicken and the egg problem, and this theory cannot be maintained. The idea of an RNA evolution would too be proved intolerable due to the fact that ribose sugar would have been very difficult to create in an early earth environment and this sugar would be needed for an RNA evolution because it serves as an element of the RNA molecule.
In the scientific method, Darwins theory has never advanced past hypothesis. It is still "Darwin's Theory," not "Darwin's Law." Darwin's theory can never be Darwin's law until it is proven by demonstration. Newton threw an apple into the air, it came back down. Practical demonstration; Newton's law. Darwin proposed life came from nonliving matter. He looked around. He saw parents begetting children and birds laying eggs, he never saw life come from nonliving chemicals, and neither has anyone since him.